Scope: it only builds and maintains tests
The agent is focused. The one thing it does is write, debug, fix, and maintain automated tests with TestDriver, and review pull requests by writing and running a test against the change. It will politely decline off-scope work โ it wonโt edit your application code, fix product bugs, answer unrelated programming questions, or act as a general coding assistant.How it behaves depends on the surface
The agent reacts to three different GitHub surfaces, and its behavior is noticeably different on each.Pull requests โ automatic code review
When a pull request is opened, the agent reviews it automatically โ nobody has to ask.- The review is the deliverable, not chatter. An automatic review is unsolicited, so the agent stays quiet while it works and posts a single review comment at the end rather than scattering inline threads across the diff or narrating each step.
- It runs the change when it can. Its default first move is to start a session, work out what the PR changes from a userโs point of view, and write and run a TestDriver test that exercises exactly that. A bug it watched happen is far more valuable than one it inferred.
- Findings are labeled by how they were found. Each finding is marked
observed(proven by actually running the change) orsuspected(reasoned out from reading the diff). If the installation isnโt signed in to TestDriver, the agent canโt run anything, so it reviews by reading and marks every findingsuspected. - It focuses on real bugs. Logic errors, regressions, broken edge cases, mishandled errors โ not style, naming, or โconsider extracting this.โ
- Zero findings is a good review. If the change looks correct, it says so in a sentence. If thereโs nothing worth reviewing (only lockfiles, generated files, or formatting), it posts nothing at all.
- It comments, it never blocks. The review is always a
COMMENTโ it never approves and never requests changes, so it canโt gate a merge.
The agent never reviews its own pull requests. PRs opened by the bot are skipped,
so it wonโt wake itself up to review the tests it just committed.
Issues โ onboarding and test building
When an issue is opened, the agent treats it as a cue to help you build a test.- If the issue describes a task, it acts on the request โ writing or debugging the test you asked for.
- If the issue is empty, it introduces itself, explains that it writes and debugs computer-use tests, and walks you through signing in to TestDriver and creating your first test.
- It finishes by opening a pull request with the test it wrote.
@mentions โ interactive conversation
Mentioning the bot (on either an issue or a PR) starts a solicited, interactive turn. Because you asked directly, the agent is chatty: it posts progress updates, shows you screenshots of whatโs happening in the sandbox, and answers follow-ups in the thread. On a PR, an @mention overrides the silent auto-review behavior โ youโll see the full play-by-play instead of just the final review comment. You can also manage the agent from a comment:@bot logout(or โsign outโ) revokes the installationโs shared TestDriver sign-in and tears down the live sandbox, so the next mention will prompt whoever responds to sign in again.
Signing in
Reading a diff needs nothing, but running the app needs a TestDriver session, which requires the installation to be signed in. Sign-in state doesnโt decide whether the agent reviews โ it decides how good the review gets. A signed-out install still gets its bugs caught from reading the code; signing in upgrades findings fromsuspected to observed.
